I was just browsing through my email treasure troves and found this one. It made me start thinking “Was this ad effective?” Here posing this question to all of you. This is an old ad I conceptualized in 2009 and this was live on San Jose airport for more than 6 months and helped the company with a solid brand recognition and recall…

Networking Software

Looking at the ad above, can you decipher:

1. Does it attract the onlooker at first glance?

2. Does it make him/her read and understand what this ad says?

3. Does it make him/her take something away after being detached from the ad?

And the final question:

Does this ad make an onlooker feel smart?

If the answers to most of the questions above is “yes”, I think this ad did a good job…

P.S: This ad is the property of TeamF1, Inc. All copyrights are owned by TeamF1 and any unlawful distribution or commercial use is strictly prohibited.

 
Hellow World on Android

Hello World on Android

Android has intrigued me since starting. My entire background being from embedded system software design and engineering, I always was interested to know how Android has been built to work in a constrained environment where the CPU juice is low, memory is not high and the demand from users are high from an App. Also, I wanted to build a small application to just be sure I have not lost that techy touch. It just came naturally to me to consider the other platforms also (read iOS and Windows Phone) but then most important was an open platform such as Android. Another reason, I have an Android phone – a real test bed – with me.

So here I started by the setting up the development tools on my Windows PC (check system requirements here). What is needed is the follows to write a basic “Hello World” program.

  1. Eclipse IDE 3+ (Download latest here. Recommended Java or Classic version)
  2. JDK 5 or 6 (JRE is not enough as they mention. JDK 6 here)
  3. ADT plug-in for Eclipse (Can be plugged-in to Eclipse – steps here: Installing the ADT plug-in)
  4. Android SDK with the right set of API packages installed

You can read further instructions on how to set it up on the above links and you are then ready to go. Once the IDE is all set, you need to setup the AVD or an Android Virtual Device which is a target platform to compile your code and create an application. This AVD will be the one you chose from the list of APIs that you have added to your Android SDK. Android has many versions such as 2.1, 2,3, 3.0 and 4.0.3 so you must setup your SDK for the right version you are targeting your app. For this example – hello world will just work on all the versions just fine so can set your AVD as any version you like. I used it same as the android device I have and also tried the Hello World app on my device.

After setting the AVD, you need to create a new project in your Eclipse IDE. Once you create a project, it will ask you which platform you are targeting and you can choose an Android App. The first thing an App creates is an Activity (or the main function of a non-OS system). You can write the Hello World code in Java in this activity and voila – you are there. You can get the full instructions and sample code here.

I just saw the output on my Android device right now (you may have to allow installation of non-market apps on your device to install this – you can install just by taking the apk file from your bin folder of the project and copy somewhere in the SD card and run that on your device). I can see the message which I printed – it is a secret :)

What I feel from this exercise is that getting started with the development environment for Android is smooth and easy. They have done a good job by giving an Eclipse plug-in and easy to understand documentation and developers like me who love to work below the OS (read HAL or hardware abstraction layers and BSP or board support packages which have all the code in assembly and C), it was a piece of cake for even people like mw. It did not take more than 45 minutes to set things up and get Hello World out from my mind to my Android device! As we know Hello World is the program that helps you setup the development and debug tools and not learn the language, my journey to learn a new platform and language starts from here.

I am definitely going to try my hands on this with a few basic apps that my kins can play with. Way to go!

 

Technological advancements are rampant today with innovative devices and IT services popping up every now and then. Many top innovators are offering better and better every day. In the midst of all this, IBM predicted recently the next most important 5 advancements in technology. Here goes the list:

  1. Bye-bye passwords: Everybody goes through this – to access anything online, register and when you register, you have to remember another password. It is so annoying that services such as LastPass and others have emerged churning money out of this problem by making a business case of offering to remember your passwords. Duh! IBM predicts something nice on this front. IBM says that the need of remembering multiple passwords will go since devices in next 5 years will become smart enough to accept bioinformatics and biometric password such as scanning eye retina or voice recognition. All these technologies exist today as we see in many movies but the hard part is not to develop technology but to make it commercially viable. Take an example of solar energy – it exists but does not have a business model since it is too expensive to replace other forms of energy. IBM hopes that biometrics (measuring biological parameters) will be viable in devices going ahead such as ATM machines that will dispense cash only listening to your voice or scanning your retina. Bye-bye passwords!
  2. Reading your mind: Scientists have been trying to find a way to gauge what mind thinks through sensors and use that information to connect us with technical devices. IBM predicts that this may happen going ahead. We may have sensors that help us interact with computers such as moving the mouse cursor. Technology will exist in near future that can understand facial expressions of a person such as anger, excitement and sorrow. This looks scary but if used in a productive manner can lead to a lot of positive applications such as gaming and entertainment. Needless to say that this technology will be a boon for medical sciences where it can be used to test brain patterns and assist in rehabilitation efforts for stroke victims and other related disorders such as autism.
  3. Digital Divide: IBM says that in five years the gap between people who have easy access to information and those who don’t will reduce considerably. Most people will have mobile phones with relevant information thanks to the Internet and smartphones.
  4. No Spam: This is the most intriguing prediction from IBM. Today, most of the email is spam and IBM says there will be none in next 5 years. First let us understand what is spam. Spam is any information displayed that we do not want to read. We subscribe to what we want to read and this we should only be shown that information. More than 85% of emails today is spam! IBM predicts that going ahead, the ad and information display will become so personalized that one will only see something relevant to her and nothing else. Thus, there will be no spam. How is it possible? Analytics software today has the ability to remember your likings through collection of unorganized information such as facebook, twitter, website you browse and comments you put online. IBM itself is working on this front where they want to make our planet a “smart planet”. Real time analytics that makes sense out of many sources of data will be smart enough to curb spam for us. Food for thought – what will happen if I do not subscribe to anything? Chances are that spammers will find their way out. Even today when you subscribe on a match making website, you also start getting job emails which may happen in future too. Let us wait and see in next 5 years.
  5. Advancements in power preservation: This is innovative stuff that IBM predicts here and if turns out to be true, can be a real game changing stuff. IBM predicts that there will be devices available that can preserve energy. Today whatever we do, we do not use any renewable energy technology to store the energy we dispense. In next 5 years devices will be available to charge a battery while we cycle and use that energy to light a lamp at home. This is cool!! We use this kind of technology in rails today where when the wheels move, they are also attached to a dynamo that store the energy to power lamps and fans with in the train. If this comes to individuals for day to day activities, it will be simply awesome.

IBM’s older predictions about other technological advancements have been pretty successful and we hope that the above also come out true. The above are all positive aspects of technology and these advancements definitely take us a notch higher on technical innovation.

 

Everybody knows how successful the iPod is and how it has turned the fortunes of Apple. A staggering 150 million iPods have been sold until July 2008. The effect of this success can be clearly seen in the share price of Apple from $7 in 2003 to $180 in July 2008. A spectacular increase of 2500%.  Apple stock market capitalization was $7 billion in 2003; it was $160 billion in July 2008. By comparison in July 2008 Microsoft stock market capitalization is $240 billion, Citicorp market cap is $90 billion, General Electric market cap is $270 billion, and Exxon stock market capitalization is $450 billion.  While Goldman Sachs stock market capitalization is $68 billion, Merrill Lynch market cap is $30 billion. Apple revenues in 2003 were $6 billion, $30 billion in the 12 months ending in April 2008.

The iPod has been the main driver of the huge Apple growth in the initial 5 years. However, few people are aware that for the first 3 years, the iPod was an absolute flop. The iPod was originally launched in October 2001, and between 2001 and 2004, sales were only about 100-200,000 per quarter, far from today’s 10-20 million units per quarter. The sales were not even covering product development and research costs. In August 2004, something remarkable happened and iPod sales began to grow strongly year after year. In August 2004, a music lover and engineer called Tony Fadell proposed the iTunes+iPod business idea. He was later hired by Apple. Fadell had approached other companies before Apple including Microsoft which termed the project uninteresting. Microsoft executives turned down Fadell and the iPod + iTunes business idea saying: “This will not make any money“. Two weeks after approaching Apple, Steve Jobs called back and said to him “Ok, I put you in charge of the development of these products and of the business concept; I give you a team of 30 brilliant guys, designers, programmers and hardware engineers”. The iPod was developed by Tony Fadell and his team in just 12 months.

The name iPod was proposed by Vinnie Chieco, who was a copyrighter and was called by Apple to find ways to launch the iPod. Even though the iTunes+iPod concept did not originate inside Apple, the merit of Steve Jobs and Apple executives was in the ability to listen, catch the idea and build a team and come out with an excellent product.

The success of the Apple iPod did not depend on marketing exclusively and the whole ecosystem built around the iPod is where it’s true strength lies.

Any competitor trying to build a better device might succeed but defeating this entire ecosystem is nearly impossible.

Hats off to the Apple IPOD!

(Written long back – all data is as of year 2008)

 

“I have long aspired to reach for the clouds and I again ascend Jinggang Mountain”.                                                                                                                                                                   – Mao Tse-tung, Reascending Jinggang Mountain (1965.05)

Amazon.com recently announced[1] that it’s Hardware-as-a-Service (HaaS) and cloud storage business is set to surpass its main stream e-retailing business in which it has a significant market share at present. This is significant shift in the way how technology and large scale operations can bring about a paradigm shift in the way businesses are run today.

Gartner defines cloud computing “as a style of computing where massively scalable IT-related capabilities are provided “as a service” using Internet technologies to multiple external customers.”

Cloud Business Providers

Cloud Business Providers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Cloud computing offerings can be classified from Level ‘0’, which is a simple virtualization platform to Level ‘3’ which offers complete data center backbone capabilities.  Figure 1 shows some of the companies that play a vital role in this space.

A recent research by Merrill lynch analyst[2]s points out that by 2011 the volume of cloud computing market opportunity would amount to $160Bn, including $95Bn in business and productivity apps (e-mail, office, CRM, etc.) and $65BN in online advertising. Compare this to the present market size of ERP[3] products worldwide at $22.4 Bn which is expected to grow at a CAGR of8% till 2012 to $ 29.6 Bn. There is no doubt that Cloud computing, utility computing and HaaS is TNBT in IT.

So what is in it for the Asian Elephant’s:  By 2010 more than 75% of the enterprises were using cloud computing devoted to very large data queries, short-term massively parallel workloads, or IT use by startups with little to no IT infrastructure. In order to cater to this massive demand the cloud computing platform has to mature in a lot of different areas[4] as mentioned below.

  1. Service management          – Reliable computing and delivery platforms
  2. Scalability                         – Development of Sequential processing  capability
  3. Costs                                – Economics of scale
  4. Culture                             – Trust, chargeback & sharing
  5. Connection                        – The better the network the better the service
  6. High availability                  – Enterprise problems in case of stateful workloads
  7. Customization                     – Ease of use

This is where we see a major role for Indian IT and Tech companies in the next few years. India with its relative geographic, political and technical advantage can be an ideal data center for the world. Indian IT companies with their huge technological prowess and infrastructure can tap on this growing market and get a lion’s share on designing, developing and maintaining these clouds.

Cloud Business

The business of Clouds

Also, the IT companies of India with their big fat idle cash balances in their balance sheets can acquire some of the cloud computing pioneers of the world in order to get a reliable head start over others. The companies to acquire for would be Akamai, Areti Internet, Enki, Fortress ITX, Layered Technologies, Rackspace, Salesforce.com, Terremark and XCalibre. Remember what Mao said in 1965.


[1] http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2008/04/block-to-the-fu.html

[2] Merrill Lynch recently issued a research note: “The Cloud Wars: $100+ billion at stake”; http://dotnet.sys-con.com/read/604936.htm

[3] http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?id=626008

[4] Source: Gartner.com, http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=8409

 

 

Ever wondered what lies beneath the billion cellphones that surround our lives. Not only is the cellphone a technically intriguing gadget but the whole industry and ecosystem built behind the making of a cellphone is amazingly complex.

The brain of a typical modern day mobile phone consists of a processing unit, which is typically split between two processors – the baseband processor and the application processor. The baseband processor takes care of the all the radio frequency communication for voice and data while the application processor runs all the applications on the phone etc. Other functinality such as bluetooth, wifi and FM radio are taken care of by dedicated controllers chips. The baseband processor is typically a DSP chipset with its custom OS while the application processor hosts typically hosts a standard operating systems such as Symbian, Windows Mobile, Linux, Nucleus OS etc. Apart from the operating system, there are plethora of applications for text processing, multimedia navigation, browsing etc.

Now the obvious questions about business – what sort of industries are part of these gadgets? The device manufactures are called the OEMs (original equipment manufactures) who build the final product and ship it for selling e.g. Nokia, Samsung, Motorola etc. The OEMs do not necessarily manufacture the hardware inside the cellphone; it comes from the semiconductor solution providers and the silicon vendors. A silicon vendor, as the name suggests, manufactures the semiconductor chips which we find inside the cell phone. The prominent companies in the baseband processor market include Texas Instruments, Infineon, Sony Erricson etc. These along with other companies such as STMicroelectronics, N-vidia etc are also into making application processors and other microcontroller chips inside the cellphone. Often a silicon vendor integrates these chips and the software components by dealing with 3rd parties and provides a complete platform as a solution to the OEM. Companies providing such solutions are known as semiconductor solution providers, for e.g. ST, TI, Freescale, NXP, Samsung Electronics etc. An OEM often contacts many silicon vendors and semiconductor solution providers to see their offerings and BOM and selects the best suited (also read as least expensive!!) ones for its product.

Next important class of companies are the software vendors. The Operating System running inside the cellphones (application processor) is licensed by companies such as Symbian (Symbian – now in shambles due to Nokia’s partnership and strategy to launch smartphones with MS OS), Microsoft (Windows Mobile), Google Android (hot!), Mentor Graphics (Nucleus RTOS), Apple iOS and BlackBerry BB10. Open source OS such as Linux were also preferred by some OEMs and solution providers for flexibility, however commercial OS is typically customized and includes an application suite which reduces the time-to-market for OEMs and with the advent of Android era for smartphones, most OEMs are focusing on that to build their next cell phones. There are also many Independent Software Vendors (ISVs) which provide applications on top of well known OS, e.g. Skype (for voip), Google (for maps).

In summary, we see that the silicon vendors, ISVs, solution providers and the OEMs make up a complete ecosystem of industries working, competing and partnering to make up the deceivingly simple device known as cellphone.

(Written long back in the year 2008. Today, many articles on businesses revolving around this space are written by the author – see below)

Timing your product launch to ensure its success
Loss Leadership, if done right leads to loads of profits

 

 

 

“One size fits all” – Do you think this strategy will work for the Small and medium enterprises IT solutions? No, actuality it won’t, what SMEs are looking for is relevant functionalities with no frills, affordability not status symbol and the best price-performance ratio.  Most IT majors, be it Microsoft, Oracle or SAP has a targeted strategy to woo this sector. But these corporations need to realize that it is a very different sector in terms of requirements, pricing, service and support.

The Indian market is very competitive and there is risk of getting left behind without proper IT infrastructure in place. The need of the hour is to identify SME difficulties, align their mission to practical solutions and provide them with a complete solution.  It calls for automating the business processes and providing long term scalable solutions, to lead to a collective growth. Staying profitable involves riding the crest of a tidal wave of change. Walking hand in hand, Software as a service (SAAS) providers will be the time-devouring vendor to rewrite transaction and associated software with every shift in the business environment and every change in business processes.

 

Another important fact to be kept in mind while approaching SMEs is that they are extreme price conscious. They are not brand conscious and seek cheaper alternatives. A good solution would be to provide them software and hardware solutions as a service and charge them on a monthly basis like any other utility service. This way the business model can be retained and only delivery mechanism would change.

Offering a component based service, with upgradation and maintenance support will help SMEs concentrate on their core capabilities and help them grow faster. Also, providing an integrated service spanning across all functions, horizontals and verticals i.e. covering the enterprise could prove to be the best solution for a small enterprise. With SMEs, instead of best-of-breed, the preferred option is to use complete software suites which are comprehensive as well as economical. Oracle’s E-Business Suite Special Edition is such an example which is already having a number of implementation all over India in the SME sector.

A final thought before concluding – SMEs seek software that is inexpensive, easy to deploy, flexible and easy to use. If a SAAS provider targets this sector and comes up with quicker and more economical implementations, this sector will prove to be a potential goldmine.

(Contributed article)

 

Generation Content has started joining Generation Cash. Confused? Simple – what it means is that if consumers produce the content, or if they are the content, and that content can actually bring in money for aggregating brands, then revenue and profit sharing is now going to be one of the main themes in the online space for the next coming years. It’s not like brands would have a choice: it actually is that talented consumers are going to be too sought after to remain satisfied with only the thank-you notes. Firms now have to realize and get ready for an avalanche of revenue sharing reward schemes and deals that are aimed at luring creative consumers.

The power of the web clubbed with the overarching meta-trend incorporating the MINPRENEURS (the mini entrepreneurs), HOBBYONOMICS (the hobby economy) and the Generation Cash + Content actually creates a globally connected brain: all the world’s talent and experience, fully networked and live-life smart, can actually create wonders for the firms planning to come up with new advertising campaigns, funky designs, or industry-defining strategies.

CURRENT EXAMPLES

For this article, we chose to focus on compensation for pics, text, videos and other creative outbursts. All you need to know is: You create and post content -> They watch and love it -> You collect the money! It is that simple.

REVVER – VIRAL VIDEO NETWORK

Members upload their content (video) to Revver which in turn connects with  makers, sharers and sponsors of internet based videos.

METACAFE

Members get paid 5 USD for thousand views their videos get on METACAFE. Licensing for these is non-exclusive: Makers retain ownership of their videos.

CITIZEN JOURNALISM

Citizen journalism sites are the ones that sell pictures and articles to media companies  on behalf of amateur photographers or writers. Scoopt, ScoopLive and SpyMedia are some of the examples.

DAY TIPPER

Daytipper is a tip rewarding site. Think of the coolest way to groom a pooch or to stash cash.

Final Notes

  • There are tens of millions of smart consumers out there who’d love that extra piece of cash. This translates into opportunities to set up companies that help consumers to sell anything to anyone.
  • Both direct & indirect selling on the web is possible.
  • Figuring out if any content creation of your brand in-house or outsources to expensive professionals could be transferred to your consumers.
(Contributed article)
 

Peer to peer networks have caused disruptive changes: Napster created uproar in the music industry, with online sharing of music, media houses reported losses of 5% in 2001, users started creating and using content, “You” was named the person of the year, share prices of the four largest established newspaper houses in US have fallen between 10 and 50 % in the past three years due to competition from alternative sources of advertising including P2P scheme. But, till now P2P has been synonymous mostly with entertainment industry.

This will change with emerging business models propagating microfinance through their P2P network. Sites such as Kiva, Prosper and Lending Club offer loans at rates as low as 6 per cent. Kiva has a more philanthropic approach with loans aimed at budding entrepreneurs in developing economies, but Lending Club specialises in loans for every occasion. The basic philosophy – it is easy to raise small amounts of capital among people who are connected to each other though their social networks and these sites provide the infrastructure and regulations for lending or borrowing. The online model removes administrative costs which conventional banks incur, thus leading to lower interest rates.

The site maintains credit ratings of borrowers, and lenders choose the kind of borrowers they want to lend to. At Prosper.com, the loans are made by WebBank, a Utah-chartered Industrial Bank and are sold to winning bidders registered as lenders. Each lender’s returns will depend on the default rate of the lender’s portfolio, and may vary over the standard 3 year term of the loan. The average returns on a portfolio at Prosper are at 11 per cent pa.

To expedite successful transaction Lending club connects borrowers and lenders which have closer degrees of separation, by checking on their Facebook or Mindspace accounts. Since the loans are unsecuritized, these affiliations create trust; you would rather give an unsecuritized loan to a person you know rather to one you don’t.

The model is still new and need to prove itself as people have trepidations lending online. The issues of risk management, capital recovery prepayment risk need to be addressed. The combination of a large social network which can offer financial services may not seem formidable at present, but it is just a matter of time before it creeps up on the arbitrage enjoyed by large banks.

(Contributed article)

 

Related Reads:
Product vs. Consumer – 4Ps or 4Cs of Marketing
Price vs. Cost – 4Ps or 4Cs of Marketing

As we discussed in previous posts (links above) that producers need to forgo the first two very important parameters of the 4Ps of marketing framework and move on to the new consumer centric framework – 4Cs of Marketing – for offering a successful marketing mix. This needs switching sides from being a seller to be a buyer. To continue on the other Ps of marketing, now we discuss the third and the next important parameter of 4Ps of marketing mix – Place – which must be considered from a consumer’s point of view.

Place, traditionally, has always been looked upon as a marketplace where merchants make themselves and their offerings available. It is a physical space where products are stored and demoed to the prospects and then offered on exchange of either other goods or some currency. This model has worked for years. Traders used to take their goods to places where there was demand. They used to face the perils of pillage and plundering of goods and currency while enroute. Things changed and routes and trade channels became easily accessible and legalized. What remained was that the consumer had to travel to the closest marketplace and buy goods. Producers always gathered at a particular place and catered to customer needs. This also made customers travel far places to acquire goods that were only available there. For example: Herbs are not available everywhere but at certain places and customer travel to get them for medical reasons.

In a transaction of goods exchange (either exchanged with goods or currency), a transaction has about 5 essential steps. Next section describes them from two different perspectives.

Sellers

1. Producing or buying in bulk the goods they plan to sell
2. Storing the goods to fulfill the demand
3. Transporting goods and making them available in the marketplace based on demand
4. Demonstrating / displaying their goods to attract customers
5. Negotiating with customers
6. Exchanging currency for goods sold

From a seller perspective, the price of products and services should be set so that they make a profit after considering all the above factors. Many a times, the price of goods increase where the availability is scarce. Supply and demand also plays a role but primarily, sellers or producers price their goods and services without considering cost for the customer. Also Read: Price vs. Cost – 4Ps or 4Cs of Marketing.

Above was a pretty simple example of how producers can reach a marketplace to sell their goods but in today’s market where global consumers are the size of the pie, producers use many strategies to make their products reach their customers. They use distributions channels to wholesalers to retailers as the middle-men where they offer in bulk to distributors who in turn offer in lesser bulk to wholesalers and so on, making the goods reach in single units to the end consumer. The above also explains the difference between a customer and consumer. Customer for retailers is also the consumer here. This helps consumers buy what they are looking for at many shops and outlets in their nearest market. This is the method used by most of the producers – before the advent of ecommerce. Let us look at the buyers perspective below.

Buyers

To make a purchase, buyer must do the following:

1. Know the marketplace for goods and traveling to the marketplace
2. Roam the marketplace for selecting goods and examining them
3. Negotiate prices for the goods they need
4. Pay for goods with the method preferred by the vendor (cash, credit, goods, etc)
5. Take the goods and traveling back to their premises
6. For defective goods, repeating the above cycle if exchange is needed (reverse supply chain – out of scope for this article).

If we see from the above, customer has to spend so much time to roam around the market to see various products and make a decision. She also has to negotiate prices if it is an unorganized market (such as road-side vendors ready to bargain rather than a retail shop with discounted and fixed MRP). Then, pay for the goods with the preferred way of payment and then carry the goods to her place. This is a highly inconvenient process and the Internet and ecommerce just solved many problems for the consumers. At the same time, they also raised many concerns and problems to be solved by marketeers.

Marketing professionals have to think how to demonstrate their products online. Some are easy to do some are difficult. Think perfumes and other intangible goods. Then they must find a way to make consumers pay the way they want to and that too securely using methods such as credit cards, debit cards, cash (cash on delivery). Next they must think of shipping the goods to them with the safest and fastest method. All this needs thinking.

Amazon did a great job in making this a reality. It never manufactured goods (until recently) but concentrated on this very important C of marketing – convenience for the consumer. It saved on cost by not investing in shops but only warehouses and shipping what consumers wanted to buy by paying securely through ecommerce – the way money moves online.

Thus, discarding this P of marketing – place – may not be a stretch. Marketplace has slowly become a virtual marketplace where consumers can even try dresses, check out the demos of various goods and order securely with a click with one day shipping all from their closet. Now that is convenience. Though the virtual marketplace may not entirely replace the stores, but for many goods, it already has and it needs marketing attention to focus on how convenient it is for the consumer to procure the goods rather than focusing on which place they should set-up their shop.

Copyright, Rohit Sukhija. All rights reserved. Theme Credits